John Mccain And Sarah Palin Hate Women, Rachel Maddow Comments


We all know John McCain and Sarah Palin are out of touch on women’s health; between McCain’s infamous air-quoting of the word “health” and Palin’s countless contradictions on reproductive health ca…

Related Posts

Tags : , , , , , , , ,

Google Reader Yahoo Facebook Twitter Digg FriendFeed Delicious Google Translate
This entry was posted onOctober 6th, 2009 at 1:21 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Responses are currently closed, but you can Trackback..

10 Responses

Comments(10)Trackbacks(0)

  1. Potatopetes

    Yay! Obama won presidency! Healthcare is actually an issue, where it’s obvious that women’s “healthcare” is not a concern to McCain

    October 6, 2009 1:38 am | #1
  2. Facebook289

    that shouldnt be the law. Thats unconstitutional and should be repealed

    October 6, 2009 2:31 am | #2
  3. satinbarbi

    They both are owned by the same people to keep us distracted.

    October 6, 2009 3:07 am | #3
  4. radioactivenews

    The Supreme court also allowed slavery. And that too was the law of the land. Was the Supreme Court right in allowing slavery to continue simply because it was the law? Nope! It was wrong everyday it was practiced as law.Got to love the lib heads… “It’s sounds cruel!” Hey! Try being on the other end of a late term abortion! Cruel doesn’t begin to describe it you sad soul!

    October 6, 2009 4:02 am | #4
  5. Facebook289

    did you just compare Abortion to Slavery? Wow something is seriously wrong with you.

    October 6, 2009 4:29 am | #5
  6. salinagrrrl69

    Ahhh Sean Hannity’s EVIL twin brother Racheal MAD-ow. S’he should shove a stainless steel implement into the base of s’his viable -outside the womb- skull…and late term s’himself.

    October 6, 2009 4:31 am | #6
  7. tube2a

    Wow, can you say quote mining? Typical media bull shit tactics.

    October 6, 2009 5:06 am | #7
  8. kdurston1

    you’ve missed the point. journalism is supposed to be unbiased. if it is not, then it is a special interest organ like Iskra and Provda in the USSR. it can still be technically called news, but we know it is nothing more than a propaganda device for the special interest group. i’m not supporting Fox news either as it suffers from the same defects. we shouldn’t have to watch two separate channels to get reasonable, and fair, representation of the issues.

    October 6, 2009 5:09 am | #8
  9. purplefuzzythings

    Oh, shouldn’t this and shouldn’t that. Stop being so indignant.We are greedy and cruel by nature, and people like Rupert Murdoch are always going to mess up your “no bias” idealism no matter what. Besides, it’s just human nature to be partially biased to some extent.Yes, the world sucks. Yes you should have all the news. But it ain’t gonna happen. Remember when Bush was stovepiping information to the NY Times? Everyone believed that info. You will never get the whole story.

    October 6, 2009 5:46 am | #9
  10. kdurston1

    I agree we will never get the whole story, Because of views like yours. the press is to challenge and question the authorities, whether Political, religious or economic. but instead we get this from the main stream media. And it is possible to give fair coverage. i do it all the time. in fact i present views i detest as strongly as i can so i might understand them better. I’m Canadian, watch CBC News & see what i’m talking about. It’s far more balanced than US. We never see diatribes like this.

    October 6, 2009 6:43 am | #10