Obama: “any Nation–including Iran,” Right To Peaceful Nuclear Power Under Npt Treaty
(6/04/09) President Barack Obama proposes in his Cairo speech to allow peaceful nuclear energy development in any nation, including Iran, if the “responsibilities” of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation…
Related Posts
Tags : Iran, Nationincluding, Nuclear, Obama, Peaceful, Power, Right, Treaty, Under
So, let me get this straight.. Obama is sitting there saying no country should use nuclear power, but he also said every country has a right to use it PEACEFULLY. This argument is the use of nuclear reactors in the U.S. Nuclear reactors should be used because it is a clean, affordable, safe way of energy. Nuclear reactors nowadays are highly STABLE and is only there to create a powerful reaction. I think reactors are the fair way to go, and the U.S. needs to release FACTS of nuclear energy.
December 29, 2009 6:14 am | #1Here’s the future Iran wants to build. Not 10, but 20 nuclear material processing plants. This policy is not working-imo
December 29, 2009 6:25 am | #2so you think that its ok that USA has over 5000 nuclear warheads? the russians have 4700 but for some reason you think iran should not even have power plants? think about it who is the biggest war-junkie of a nation in the history of earth? the correct answer is North Amerika thats right those insane overpatriotic psychos destroying everything claiming they have noble goals but never accomplish any all they do is kill kill kill, i know most amerikans arent like that but those in charge are.
December 29, 2009 6:45 am | #3Get all major civilized nations to the “adjust Iran” table – and realize that each month that passes makes more difficult the necessary ousting of Irans’ dictator ‘posing’ as a democrat. Military action to depose the thug, so that Moussavi (or similar, normal leader). Dmb-guys Bush and McCain are right and the world has to give them that, then get to the messy business of invading Iran. Great if it wasn’t necessary but it is so quit waffling over it and get it done!!
December 29, 2009 7:40 am | #4i would rather that then men that cant face a nother man before takin his life icall the cowards not heros give of armor and swords and shit that will prove the weaker and stronger natiosns anyone can kill with rockets and guns look into there eyes and watch there soul leave
December 29, 2009 8:01 am | #5He is denutting our military…soon we may have to fight with rocks
December 29, 2009 8:25 am | #6no concern about russia since it became stable, was massive worries before hand with spies and counter spies. Russia was packed up in a corner and didnt have a working ICBM till the 90s (when the USSR had been gone) before that it was all bs talk(why do you think the cuban missle crisis happened).Iran could easily get hold of the ability to use a short range nuclear weapon, all it wants to do is hit israel really, its obviously wanting too, read my other post for an easy look at it
December 29, 2009 9:16 am | #7problem is, iran doesnt need nuclear power, 1)its a dangerous thing if it goes up 2)they have a massive oil reserve 3)they have a massive amount of sunlight every day of the year, solar energy?
December 29, 2009 10:12 am | #8Ã muito fácil pregar o desarmamento, quando uns têm a bomba e os outros, não!Coitados dos que não têm!Jamais merecerão respeito. Ao menor cheiro de crise, ouvirão: se cuide; tenho a bomba e você, não!
December 29, 2009 10:40 am | #9so far I believe that Obama shows the stark difference between the previous admin. and how it will successfully deal with the middle east. He has not moved his position on interfering early with the Iranian election, that shows strength not foolishness. If McCain was president he would have dealt in an unstable manner based off of his recent comments, that would further the chaos…you will see, it was the right the move.
December 29, 2009 11:30 am | #10