RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘Attack’

If Obama initiated a preemptive nuclear attack on New Zealand, would Obamanites still support him?

19 Aug

Are die hard Obama supporters living in a fantasy world and are they blind to reality? If Obama went insane and ordered the attack on a country like New Zealand, would Obamanites claim he was a genius.

 
9 Comments

Posted in

 

Would Obama attack Iran if they are close to getting nuclear weapons? Obama would just talk to them. Right?

18 Aug

I want to vote for good old Barack. He’s so nice. I just want to make sure that he would never pull a George Bush and order the invasion of a country to prevent them from getting nuclear weapons. Iran is just a small country compared to the old Soviet Union. The Iranians are just a bunch of harmless people. We really should try to understand their anger. Maybe we could drop a few bombs or something? Oh … I’m sure Speaker Pelosi could go over there and straighten things out! She could do it!

 
14 Comments

Posted in

 

Is Obama and his “National Socialist’s” regime attack on Fox News final proof of their fear of it?

15 Aug

*** SORRY ALL, THE SOCIALIST GOT IT REMOVED. I JUST REPOSTED IS ALL ***

I have posted questions before asking you out there why Obama and his ilk are scared of Fox News. I always get a good grouping of answers, some pro some con; then you get the Obama Nation Socialist that cant stand to hear that their Fuhrer is not God himself so they flame the question, but the crux of the question is why the fear?

If you were to ask me, I would say it is because they (Obama and his regime) are being called out and like anyone one who has ruled like Obama wishes he could; doesn’t like criticism of the regime.

Now like I said before I was going after ideas for what I already know, but now with the embarrassing and neurotic attack Obama and his staff has lobbed at Fox News in print and on the net, has he finally tipped his hand?

Now I heard this comment for the first time today so don’t send me to a death camp for getting it wrong, but it was said that “ You should not mess with those who buy ink in barrels. “ ( A paraphrase of course ) In other words, the media can make or break you.

With the DNC going to be suffering devastating losses in 2010, you would think that the Obama regime would have known better then to attack a news outlet.

Now don’t get me wrong, I do not hate you members of the DNC; I just feel your party was usurped by the National Socialist in the guise of being members of the Democratic Party. Me I would be mad as hell.

How does this make you real DNC members feel?

I attached a video from the Glen Beck show calling Obama out for his attack. Do you think what he is saying is right?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kxg4fJH9QRw

All views, even ones of the National Socialist Party are welcome but if you flame the question you will be reported and removed. Thank you.

 
15 Comments

Posted in

 

Can Obama stay focused on Health Care even under nuclear attack?

14 Aug

With many on the brink of bankruptcy and threat of nuclear war looming, Unemployment dangerously high if Pres. Obama gets control of Health Care then what industry will be next. What was his annual salary before he became President of the United States? Should his salary be brought under Government Control?

 
4 Comments

Posted in

 

Will Bush Attack Pakistan just to beat Obama to the Punch / cheat Obama out of the chance to attack someone?

27 Jul

Or is there enough 3rd World Nations for Obama to choose from.

He’s a resilient guy I think if Bush cheats him out of Attacking Pakistan that Obama will find someone else to Attack

 
4 Comments

Posted in

 

How will Obama counter a nuclear attack if he is away from his teleprompter?

26 Jul

How will he read the codes or ask for the briefcase?

 
18 Comments

Posted in

 

When Obama said no nuclear retaliation against non nuclear countries was that a signal to terrorist to attack?

25 Jul

If we as americans can sit back and listen to this moron and not get a little bit suspicious doesnt this prove that we are all a bunch of morons just like him?

 
7 Comments

Posted in

 

Why do top clinton officials believe that the only thing that can save obama is a TERRORIST attack?

22 Jul

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/434315b2-8ea6-11df-8a67-00144feab49a.html

Obama faces growing credibility crisis
By Edward Luce in Washington

Published: July 13 2010 18:51 | Last updated: July 13 2010 18:51

Robert Gibbs, Barack Obama’s chief spokesman, got into hot water this week for daring to speak the truth – that the Democrats could lose control of the House of Representatives in November. But it could be even worse than that.

Contrary to pretty much every projection until now, Democratic control of the Senate is also starting to coming into question. While Mr Obama’s approval ratings have continued to fall, and now hover at dangerously close to 40 per cent according an ABC-Washington Post poll published on Tuesday, the fate of his former colleagues in the Senate looks even worse.

Add to that the continuing woes of Harry Reid, the Senate Democratic majority leader, in Nevada, where the Republican party’s recent nomination of Sharron Angle, a far-right and highly eccentric Tea Party supporter, appear to have had no positive effect on Mr Reid’s prospects, and the Grand Old party has a good shot at taking control of both houses of Congress. Worse for Mr Obama, political scientists say that at this stage in the calendar, there is almost nothing he can do about it.

“If you ask me where the silver lining is for President Obama, I have to say I cannot see one,” says Bill Galston, a former Clinton official, who has been predicting for months the Democrats could lose the House. “Just as BP’s failure to cap the well has been so damaging, Obama’s failure to cap unemployment will be his undoing. There is nothing he can do to affect the jobless rate before November.”

The direction of the data could hardly be worse. According to Democracy Corps, a group headed by Stanley Greenberg, a liberal pollster who is a close friend of Rahm Emanuel, Mr Obama’s chief of staff, a majority of US citizens see Mr Obama as “too liberal”.

Astonishingly, 55 per cent of citizens think Mr Obama is a “socialist” against only 39 per cent who do not share that diagnosis. The same poll shows 48 per cent support for Republicans against just 42 per cent for Democrats. The numbers are eerily similar to 2006, except that it was George W. Bush’s Republicans who were on the receiving end four years ago.

–READ HERE—

“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” says Rob Shapiro, another former Clinton official and a supporter of Mr Obama. “He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”

—[SO HOW COULD THIS "EVENT" SAVE HIM?]

In private, informal advisors to Mr Obama are almost as negative. According to one, the US public’s loss of confidence in Mr Obama’s leadership is a factor above and beyond their dissatisfaction over the state of the real economy, which continues to slow as last year’s $787bn stimulus starts to run dry. The adviser, who asked to remain anonymous, said the public did not know what Mr Obama really believed. Examples include his lukewarm support last year for a public option in the healthcare bill and his equally lukewarm support today for a Senate bill that would extend unemployment insurance and aid state governments to keep teachers in their jobs.

In both cases, Mr Obama has offered only token, negotiable, support. “I never thought I would say this, but even I’m unsure what President Obama really believes,” says the adviser. “Instead of outsourcing decisions to Congress, he should spell out his bottom line. That is what leaders are for.”

Next week, Mr Obama is likely to sign a historic Wall Street re-regulation bill into law. Earlier this year he did the same for healthcare. But polls show the public either does not care, or even opposes these otherwise big reforms. “The longer this goes on, the more it looks like Obama wasted his first year on healthcare,” said the outside adviser. “It’s still the economy, stupid.”
.Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2010. You may share using our article tools. Please don’t cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.
That is actually from the Financial times, and the article is putting a good spin on Obama – they are PRO-Obama.

It is not a diatribe, it is an article from a mainstream publication.
He was a top ADVISOR, excuse me.
Let me put it this way, the guy that said this was Clinton’s Carl Rove.
rz1971 – People rallied around George Bush after 9/11 (that was also the reason he was re-elected). People rallied around Clinton after OKC bombing.

 
9 Comments

Posted in Do you Hate Obama?

 

Will there be an attempted attack on the Obama Inauguration next Tuesday?

05 Jul

With how many terrorist organizations in our country and in the world does anyone think an attack could happen next tuesday in Washington D.C.

 
7 Comments

Posted in Do you Hate Obama?

 

Why do some Democrats attack my view-point about Obama when not everything I say is negative?

09 Jun

It almost democrats don’t like any debate on Obama’s programs as if it’s wrong to critique anything Obama does or say’s.

I’m VERY glad we have Checks & Balances….it made me sleep better when Bush was President AND had a very vocal opposition to him, I really like that system and I believe Obama should be scrutinized on everything he does………………it works!

I’m not against everything he does and say’s or stands for.

Here’s a pro-Obama issue I feel that is positive (to show fairness)

I believe Obama is an excellent role-model for black youth, Obama has replaced the rapper image of what a black man should be. He’s clean, well spoken, intelligent, educated, soft spoken with weird twisted rhymes that bash women, police and white people in general.

In this regard I think he’s an excellent example

 
9 Comments

Posted in Do you Hate Obama?

 

Have conservatives truly run out of ways to attack Barrack Obama?

01 Jun

Name calling seems to be the best tactic these people have. I can see them all sitting around in a circle, PBR being passed about freely, saying “Barrack Hussein Obama!!!” like it’s some big deal that he has an Arabic middle name. Lots of people do. Also, the idea that Obama is some sort of “Secret Muslim” just sickens me. I readily belive that there is no religous test for public office.

 
20 Comments

Posted in

 

Other than the 2nd Amendment,What other parts of the Constitution does Obama plan to attack?

22 May

We already know for certain he will do everything within his power to diminish or eliminate 2nd Amendment rights.It’s coming soon.But what other parts does he plan on attacking?

 
19 Comments

Posted in

 

When is FOX News going to attack Obama again?

30 Apr

McCain is already locked up for the Republican Nomination, FOX News has a lot of time in their hands. So, when is the next big attack on Obama?

I can’t wait! I hope it’s something BIG – not like the one about the Muslim school story, that was lame.

 
28 Comments

Posted in Do you Hate Obama?

 

Taliban chief Baitullah Mehsud says he is going to attack the Obama White House, who put him up to this?

28 Apr

Is this the latest Republican attempt to derail the recovery from the Bush Depression? A Rush Limbaugh publicity stunt? McCain’s revenge?

 
3 Comments

Posted in

 

What is Barack Hussein Obama going to do to prevent another 9/11 type of attack?

14 Apr

Today, 9/11/2008 marks the seventh anniversary of the 9/11 attacks on the WTC and the pentagon.

It is clear to me that John McCain is the best choice for stopping terrorism on US soil. He has said time and time again, that he will hunt down where ever the terrorist are and hunt down how ever many of them they are. He will continue to work with the FBI, CIA, NSA and Homeland Security to create & improve methods, techniques & technology to hunt these agents of evil. John McCain service record speaks for itself…..

Full Name: John Sidney McCain III
Military Service Experience:
Service/branch: United States Navy
Years of service: 1958 – 1981 (Served 23 Years)
Rank: Captain
Battles/wars: Vietnam
POW: 5 ½ Years
Awards: Silver Star, Legion of Merit, Distinguished Flying Cross, Bronze Star, Purple Heart, Meritorious Service Medal, Air Medal, Navy Commendation Medal, Combat Action Ribbon, Prisoner of War Medal

Political Experience:
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Arizona’s 1st district
In office: January 3, 1983 – January 3, 1987 (Served 2 terms)

Senior Senator from Arizona – Incumbent
In office: January 3, 1987 – Current (Served 21 years)

Now on the other hand, is Barack Hussein Obama.

He wants to scale back, disband and remove many of the methods, techniques & technology that were put in place by President Bush (because Bush put them there) that are used to hunt these terrorist down. Doesn’t Obama understand that it isn’t by accident that we have not been attacked in over 7 years? Obama wants to make peace (“break bread”) with the terrorist and our enemies that wish to destroy everything that America stands for. H wants to talk to them and to “try to figure out why they hate us”.

Obama disclosed that he had once considered serving in the military to ABC’s George Stephanopoulos in an interview, Obama himself said….

“You know, I actually did,” Obama said. “I had to sign up for Selective Service when I graduated from high school. And I was growing up in Hawaii. And I have friends whose parents were in the military. There are a lot of Army, military bases there.

“And I actually always thought of the military as an ennobling and, you know, honorable option. But keep in mind that I graduated in 1979. The Vietnam War had come to an end. We weren’t engaged in an active military conflict at that point. And so, it’s not an option that I ever decided to pursue.” (<—- KEY POINT)

Does Obama think we’re all stupid? Because the US isn’t at war that isn’t any reason to serve honorable service in the armed forces? So, only in wartime, armed forces serve with honor and they rest of the time they don’t? Why must a person only serve in wartime, Obama???

Just look at his voting record…..

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/o000167/key-votes/

Obama even has terrorist ties. Besides Rezko and Giannoulias, Obama could face questions about his relationship with William Ayers, a former member of the radical group the Weather Underground who is now a professor of education at the University of Illinois in Chicago. Ayers donated $200 in 2001 to Obama’s Illinois state Senate campaign and served with him from 1999 to 2002 on the board of the Woods Fund, an anti-poverty group. William Ayers was involved in a series of bombings for the group The Weather Underground in the early 1970s — including the U.S. Capitol and the Pentagon. While Ayers was never prosecuted for those attacks, he told the New York Times in an interview published Sept. 11, 2001, that “I don’t regret setting bombs.”

First, Ayers contributed money to Obama. Want proof….

Amount (of $200.00) Contributed By William Ayers (1329 E. 50th Street, Chicago, IL 60615) Received By Barack Obama (on 4/2/2001, Individual Contribution to Friends of Barack Obama, inc.)
Second, this is more than a casual acquaintance. Obama and Ayers did serve together on the board of the Woods Fund. Did Obama and Ayers do more than simply sit side-by-side? Did they steer money to favored groups? Those are questions that journalists not bowing at the feet of the Obama “Messiah” need to ask. I am told, but have not yet be able to 100% confirm, that they steered money to an individual who is under Federal indictment. If that is true, it will get more interesting.
Even people like Omar Kadafi and (the Hitler of our time) Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (the president of IRAN who wants to wipe Israel & the US off the face of the Earth) support Barack Hussein Obama and want him in office. Do you see anything wrong here???
Actually, MonaLisa Overdrive AM VT wannabe, it was on Bill Clinton’s watch that the 1993 WTC bombing happened, The US Embassy attacks, and the USS Cole. Bush wasn’t in office for more than 9 month before 9/11 happened. Not enough time to do much of anything to prevent it. Plus Bill Clinton had all the data about Bin Laden which he never passed onto Bush, giving him a “head up” as to what terrorist were planning to do. Bill Clinton had 8 years to stop 9/11 from ever happening (even the Saudi government was going to hand over Bid Laden to the US) but Bill Clinton did nothing (and refused). Sorry but that is Bill’s legacy forever.
To Mirriam M -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_attack

Now I did a full hardcore search for Bill Clinton’s name in this historical article and other article related to the 1993 WTC bombing from Wikipedia.org (the online encyclopedia) and I don’t see Bill Clinton’s name mentioned at all. The ATF, NYPD, PORT AUTHORTY & the FBI were the ones who researched evidence, arrested and prosecuted the men responsible. They did all the work. It doesn’t appear that Bill Clinton did anything to prevent the 1993 WTC attack (which he could have had he been paying more attention) or much of anything in its aftermath nor did I see a 1993 WTC fund for families affected by the 93’ attack. I did find one for the 9/11 attacks.

I did find this however…… (continued below)….
…….I did find this however……

In “State of War” by Pulitzer Prize Wining Author James Risen, upon taking power in 1993 the Clinton administration “began slashing the intelligence budget in search of a Peace dividend, and Clinton showed almost no interest in intelligence matters”.

Also don’t forget it was Clinton who allowed North Korea to acquire the means to make nuclear weapons, which is why we have the problem we now have with N. Korea today.

And don’t forget the events of the failed Battle of Mogadishu (Bid Laden was behind that too). Clinton ordered troops out of the country in March 1994. This left Somalia in a state of anarchy, with warlords battling for control for over 10 years.

“The objective of war is not to die for your country, its to make the other poor bastard die for his” – George S. Patton (WWII General).

“Do you know why we lost Veitnam? We pulled out. When your fighting you got to stay in there until they’re all dead”- George Carlin (comic)

 
13 Comments

Posted in